<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Librarians Unclear on the Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mythago.com/blog/2007/02/18/librarians-unclear-on-the-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mythago.com/blog/2007/02/18/librarians-unclear-on-the-concept/</link>
	<description>performs a blog dance for your amusement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:22:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Pricken</title>
		<link>http://www.mythago.com/blog/2007/02/18/librarians-unclear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Pricken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mythago.com/blog/?p=21#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The scrotum is not the nuts or the balls. It’s a little like confusing the labia with the ovaries.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, where I hail from (Germany), being bitten in the nuts or the balls is perfectly understandable despite being not anatomically correct in any dog attack out there. And it is only a little like confusing the labia with the ovaries, because the snake in question might have actually hit the balls in biting the scrotum, whereas it would have to be a magical bite in the league of the JFK bullet to hit the ovaries when biting the labia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The scrotum is not the nuts or the balls. It’s a little like confusing the labia with the ovaries.</i></p>
<p>Well, where I hail from (Germany), being bitten in the nuts or the balls is perfectly understandable despite being not anatomically correct in any dog attack out there. And it is only a little like confusing the labia with the ovaries, because the snake in question might have actually hit the balls in biting the scrotum, whereas it would have to be a magical bite in the league of the JFK bullet to hit the ovaries when biting the labia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenician in a time</title>
		<link>http://www.mythago.com/blog/2007/02/18/librarians-unclear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenician in a time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mythago.com/blog/?p=21#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Librarians are generally the first line of defense against censorious idiots, but apparently they’re letting just anybody learn the Dewey Decimal System these days:&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, we bloody *push* the DDC on anyone who wants to learn it - makes our job so much easier.

&lt;i&gt;What did they go and used scrotum, anyway? They should have used balls, nuts, or any other kind of technical term.&lt;/i&gt;

The scrotum is not the nuts or the balls.  It&#039;s a little like confusing the labia with the  ovaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Librarians are generally the first line of defense against censorious idiots, but apparently they’re letting just anybody learn the Dewey Decimal System these days:</i></p>
<p>Actually, we bloody *push* the DDC on anyone who wants to learn it &#8211; makes our job so much easier.</p>
<p><i>What did they go and used scrotum, anyway? They should have used balls, nuts, or any other kind of technical term.</i></p>
<p>The scrotum is not the nuts or the balls.  It&#8217;s a little like confusing the labia with the  ovaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.mythago.com/blog/2007/02/18/librarians-unclear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mythago.com/blog/?p=21#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>I assume this is the same type of librarian who uses a bottle of white-out to paint underwear on the boy in &quot;In the Night Kitchen&quot;. Not that anyone would dare call that particular children&#039;s classic &quot;quality literature&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume this is the same type of librarian who uses a bottle of white-out to paint underwear on the boy in &#8220;In the Night Kitchen&#8221;. Not that anyone would dare call that particular children&#8217;s classic &#8220;quality literature&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Robyn</title>
		<link>http://www.mythago.com/blog/2007/02/18/librarians-unclear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Robyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mythago.com/blog/?p=21#comment-531</guid>
		<description>“But you won’t find men’s genitalia in quality literature.”

What &quot;quality literature&quot; has this lady been reading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“But you won’t find men’s genitalia in quality literature.”</p>
<p>What &#8220;quality literature&#8221; has this lady been reading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Pricken</title>
		<link>http://www.mythago.com/blog/2007/02/18/librarians-unclear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Pricken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mythago.com/blog/?p=21#comment-480</guid>
		<description>What did they go and used scrotum, anyway? They should have used balls, nuts, or any other kind of technical term. Not this dirty word.

Somewhat fitting: A recent children&#039;s book in Germany about human anatomy had an explorer traveling through the body in a miniature craft. It was quite nicely written, until you came to the part where the genitalia were described – and noticed that there was not part where the genitalia were described. That&#039;s right, Timmy, people look like barbie dolls down there. 

And if they do, scrotum is a nonsensical word, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did they go and used scrotum, anyway? They should have used balls, nuts, or any other kind of technical term. Not this dirty word.</p>
<p>Somewhat fitting: A recent children&#8217;s book in Germany about human anatomy had an explorer traveling through the body in a miniature craft. It was quite nicely written, until you came to the part where the genitalia were described – and noticed that there was not part where the genitalia were described. That&#8217;s right, Timmy, people look like barbie dolls down there. </p>
<p>And if they do, scrotum is a nonsensical word, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnchx</title>
		<link>http://www.mythago.com/blog/2007/02/18/librarians-unclear-on-the-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>johnchx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mythago.com/blog/?p=21#comment-447</guid>
		<description>It occurs to me that, once upon a time, in &lt;i&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; rural America, knowledge of the reproductive anatomy and functions of common farm animals was understood to be more or less universal among children who had reached walking age.  Only in a country of &lt;i&gt;pretend&lt;/i&gt; rural-ness is such fastidiousness even thinkable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me that, once upon a time, in <i>actually</i> rural America, knowledge of the reproductive anatomy and functions of common farm animals was understood to be more or less universal among children who had reached walking age.  Only in a country of <i>pretend</i> rural-ness is such fastidiousness even thinkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

