If you were to combine a Feng Shui game and an action movie revolving around dragons, especially if you were targeting it to an audience with a high tolerance for, and ability to forgive, plot holes larger than many New England states, then you really could not do better than Dragon Wars.

Old Master Fu! Reborn heroes! Giant scaly evil wyrms devouring elephants! Helicopter vs. flying dragon aerial combat over Los Angeles! Grim-faced FBI agents trying to figure out just what the hell we’re dealing with here, Mr. Secretary of Defense! Angst-ridden Korean doomed lovers!

Gamemaster Joe-Bob says check it out.

 

That’d be “happy new year” to our Gentile guests.

This is an excellent time to send a Rabbi-Gram.

 

Amanda writes about the “ZOMG John Edwards is a trial lawyar!!!11! smearing, and unfortunately, as is so often the case, people are reduced to putting “tort reform” into quotes to make clear that the National Association of Manufacturers/Chamber of Commerce/DRI crowd isn’t about actually reforming the tort system. Yet it’s hard to find a good term, since ‘corporate welfare’ is both a mouthful and pretty broad, including as it does those who think government assistance is bad when given to an African-American single mother, but good when it’s given to a legal entity that trades on NASDAQ.

I would suggest the term McTools for these folks. “Tools”, obviously; the ones who aren’t actually corporate masters themselves are happy in their role as paid zealous advocate, in or out of the courtroom. The “Mc” because if they hadn’t invented a distorted version of the McDonald’s coffee-injury case, they’d have to invent it, being as they are friend to anything with “Inc.” after its name that is dedicated to making money, large multinational corporations being a favorite.

Hey, they didn’t get the public’s ire up about the ATLA to AAJ name change. Why not give them something else to cause another epic fit of monocle-clutching?

You see a stanza here.

 Comments Off
Sep 032007
 

When Musicians Play Interactive Fiction, at Grand Text Auto.

 h/t: Infocult

 

Because we expect a little paranoia and overreaction from brand-new parents with brand-new babies. From a parent with two school-age children, you expect a little better than this:

Continue reading »

Sep 022007
 

I’ve been meaning to read this one forever, as it’s one of the SF Classics. It’s recently been reprinted in paperback.

It’s no Iron Dream, but I enjoyed it. It’s one of the novels of the “New Wave” of SF, and it shows; at times the prose is very stream-of-consciousness, hip wordplay, irritating. Jack Barron runs a video equivalent of a talk radio show, where the average person can call in to “Bug Jack Barron” with whatever’s bugging them, and then Jack, on air, places a call. And God help you if you’re the person he calls–Congressman, corporate honcho–and you’re not there to be served up as entertainment. Jack’s no hero, and the slide from his and his friends’ youthful idealism to cynical and powerful adulthood is particularly relevant and interesting now when you look at what the Boomers are up to. It’s far from a simple morality play.

That said, the book was written in 1969, and boy does it show. The slang isn’t very far at all from the ’60s (“cool it” and “dig” are common), and where the book takes two steps forward in its awareness of racial issues, it takes about six steps back in terms of gender. The female characters don’t do much but take up spac, mainly in bed. Sarah, the heroine, is whiny, wispy and ineffectual. It’s hard to see why she and Jack are each others’ great loves except that, you know, she’s the chick. His chick.

© 2012 mythago Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha