Sunday book blogging

 Comments Off
Oct 032011
 

(Shut up. For blog purposes this is still Sunday.)

I don’t have time or energy to do full reviews, as today was probably the least productive day ever recorded in human history, but here’s stuff you should look at:

The Sherlockian (Graham Moore) – a mysterious murder in the world of Sherlock Holmes nerds, intertwined with the story of a murder investigation conducted by Arthur Conan Doyle, who has just rid himself of Holmes in “The Final Problem”. Our nerd-hero is very likeable and the Doyle portrait is very believable. This is a breath of fresh air if you made the understandable error of trying to read The Arcanum.

Getting Off (Lawrence Block) – yes, okay, the cover will have people on BART looking at you funny. I was expecting it to be okay but not great, and it was actually quite good. Not Eight Million Ways to Die good, but well worth a read. Kit, our heroine, has sex with men and then kills them, for reasons that make perfect sense to her. I was expecting this to turn into a cat-and-mouse game with a brave detective investigating the killings, but Block knows better than to pull that nonsense. One finds oneself torn between rooting for Kit and being creeped out.

The Book of Cthulhu (edited by Ross E. Lockhart) – a compendium of stories “inspired by” Lovecraft, which means it’s a very mixed bag. Some of the stories are really well-done (like Caitlin Kiernan, surprise surprise) and others appear to have been phoned in, or missed the point entirely.

How Not to Write a Screenplay (Denny Martin Finn) – on the first page, the author lays out for us that he’s not a screenwriter; he’s the reader. Therefore, as the person who is going to help decide whether your screenplay is rejected or not, he has a great deal of advice on what works and what doesn’t, what used to be in screenplays that is left out, and he compares crappy screenplays (with the serial numbers filed off) with really good writing from actual moves. I found this very interesting from a non-screenwriter perspective because it has very useful information about what goes into a novel that doesn’t belong in a screenplay, and possibly vice versa. The Arcanum, I’m looking at you, damn it.

Art History: A Very Short Introduction (Dana Arnold) – good grid, I love the Very Short Introduction series. The books are small enough to be portable, Oxford gets actual experts to write them, and you can feel especially smart. Instead of reading a “Dummies” book you can pretend you’re reading “Dummies for Very Intelligent People with Little Spare TIme”. This is a good overview of the discipline of art history and approaches to the history and curation of art, and if a Philistine like me can understand it, it should be perfectly adequate for you.

 

Shakespeare is one thing, but there’s a reason the whole Great American Writers passed me by, and Garland Grey nails it.

Movie review: Inception

 Comments Off
Jul 262010
 

The only negative about this movie is that it doesn’t follow the Mo Movie Rule. This is offset by the fact that the female member of the heist team is present because of her brains and skill, not her cleavage, and while pretty in a well-scrubbed Midwestern sort of way, is not a model and is not there to provide a romantic subplot for the hero.

It’s so nice to watch a movie that has a well-written script, addresses potential plot holes and deals with exposition intelligently.

Sep 022007
 

I’ve been meaning to read this one forever, as it’s one of the SF Classics. It’s recently been reprinted in paperback.

It’s no Iron Dream, but I enjoyed it. It’s one of the novels of the “New Wave” of SF, and it shows; at times the prose is very stream-of-consciousness, hip wordplay, irritating. Jack Barron runs a video equivalent of a talk radio show, where the average person can call in to “Bug Jack Barron” with whatever’s bugging them, and then Jack, on air, places a call. And God help you if you’re the person he calls–Congressman, corporate honcho–and you’re not there to be served up as entertainment. Jack’s no hero, and the slide from his and his friends’ youthful idealism to cynical and powerful adulthood is particularly relevant and interesting now when you look at what the Boomers are up to. It’s far from a simple morality play.

That said, the book was written in 1969, and boy does it show. The slang isn’t very far at all from the ’60s (“cool it” and “dig” are common), and where the book takes two steps forward in its awareness of racial issues, it takes about six steps back in terms of gender. The female characters don’t do much but take up spac, mainly in bed. Sarah, the heroine, is whiny, wispy and ineffectual. It’s hard to see why she and Jack are each others’ great loves except that, you know, she’s the chick. His chick.

 

Elizabeth May, now the executive director of Sierra Club of Canada, has written a short and highly entertaining book called How to Save the World in Your Spare Time. It’s hard to find the happy medium between dippy, counterproductive overoptimism and defeatist cynicism, but May does it. The book is somewhat slanted towards environmentalism, because that’s what May does; but the principles apply to any grassroots movement. (Even the bad ones, I would assume.) It’s also full of entertaining anecdotes and cautionary tales, beginning with the story of how May’s mother saved the planet.

© 2012 mythago Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha